Largest SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Ed. Databases

I like to obtain information on several of the largest
SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition databases? With the
hardware specification and disk space (SAN, LUN, etc.)
they are using.
Also would be helpful the average number of transactions
per minute the server is handling.
If the application used a third party utility to enhance
application scheduling?
I would like to obtain this information for trading floor
application that I'm am working on.
Thanks,
MikeHi,
Have a look into the below link for details.
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evalua.../wintercorp.asp
Thanks
Hari
MCDBA
"Mike" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:15a7501c446c5$e8df33a0$a101280a@.phx
.gbl...
> I like to obtain information on several of the largest
> SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition databases? With the
> hardware specification and disk space (SAN, LUN, etc.)
> they are using.
> Also would be helpful the average number of transactions
> per minute the server is handling.
> If the application used a third party utility to enhance
> application scheduling?
> I would like to obtain this information for trading floor
> application that I'm am working on.
> Thanks,
> Mike|||Mike,
'Scalability and Very Large Database (VLDB) Resources'
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin...scalability.asp
'Transaction Processing Performance Council'
http://www.tpc.org/
Dinesh
SQL Server MVP
--
--
SQL Server FAQ at
http://www.tkdinesh.com
"Mike" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:15a7501c446c5$e8df33a0$a101280a@.phx
.gbl...
> I like to obtain information on several of the largest
> SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition databases? With the
> hardware specification and disk space (SAN, LUN, etc.)
> they are using.
> Also would be helpful the average number of transactions
> per minute the server is handling.
> If the application used a third party utility to enhance
> application scheduling?
> I would like to obtain this information for trading floor
> application that I'm am working on.
> Thanks,
> Mike